linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1204701189.17994.1.camel@ymzhang>
Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:13:09 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 07:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Have you had a chance to git-bisect the culprit after the revert?
> >
> > How to bisect it if the reverted patch is submitted after the culprit 
> > patch?
> 
> i do this by using quilt ontop of git-bisect.
Thanks for your kind information. My machines are buys in testing 2.6.25-rc4.

Let me find a timeslot to track this issue again.

-yanmin

> 
> I do something like this:
> 
>   mkdir patches
>   echo revert.patch > patches/series
>   git-log -1 -p 62fb185130e4d420f > patches/revert.patch 
> 
>   git-bisect start
>   git-bisect  bad v2.6.24-rc3
>   git-bisect good v2.6.24
> 
>   quilt push           # the revert is applied
>   [ test the kernel ]
>   quilt pop            # revert is unapplied
> 
>   git-bisect bad       # if it's still bad
> 
>   quilt push           # apply the revert again
>   [ test the next kernel ]
>   quilt pop            # undo the revert
> 
>   git-bisect good      # if it's good
> 
> etc. NOTE: if the "quilt push" fails, it's likely because you are in a 
> point in the tree that does not have the reverted commits applied yet. 
> In that case there's no need to push/pop, just test the bisection point.
> 
> Note, since there are _two_ guilty commits here:
> 
>       commit 58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729
>       Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>       Date:   Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100
>       sched: group scheduling, change how cpu load is calculated
> 
>       commit 6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79
>       Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>       Date:   Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100
>       sched: group scheduler, fix fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task
> 
> make sure the bisection point is never "between" these two commits.
> 
> You can check whether a bisection point has the two guilty commits 
> applied, via:
> 
>   git-log | grep -E '58e2d4ca581167c2a0|6b2d7700266b9402e12'
> 
> if this comes up empty, the guilty commits are not applied.
> 
> 	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/