lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080305.000014.245410231.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:14 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dmantipov@...dex.ru
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are Linux pipes slower than the FreeBSD ones ?

From: Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:46:57 +0300

> Despite of this obvious fact, recently I've tried to compare pipe
> performance on Linux and FreeBSD systems. Unfortunately, Linux
> results are poor - ~2x slower than FreeBSD. The detailed description
> of the test case, preparation, environment and results are located
> at http://213.148.29.37/PipeBench, and everyone are pleased to look
> at, reproduce, criticize, etc.

FreeBSD does page flipping into the pipe receiver, so rerun your test
case but have either the sender or the receiver make changes to
their memory buffer in between the read/write calls.

FreeBSD's scheme is only good for benchmarks, rather then real life.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ