linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Cpuset hardwall flag: Introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2008 06:23:18 -0600
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	menage@...gle.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Cpuset hardwall flag:  Introduction

Paul M wrote:
> Currently the cpusets mem_exclusive flag is overloaded to mean both
> "no-overlapping" and "no GFP_KERNEL allocations outside this cpuset".
> 
> These patches add a new mem_hardwall flag with just the allocation
> restriction part of the mem_exclusive semantics, without breaking
> backwards-compatibility for those who continue to use just
> mem_exclusive.

... too bad this nice comment wasn't included in PATCH 2/2, so that
it would automatically make it into the record of history - the source
control log message (as best I understand how Andrew's tools work,
comments off in their own, codeless patch "PATCH 0/N" don't make
it to the source control log, except when Andrew chooses to make a
special effort.)

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/