[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080305125143.GB19549@ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:51:43 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc3] Smack: Don't register smackfs if we're not
loaded
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:44:45PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:45:04AM -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
...
> > >
> > > What is the oops? Why does it happen?
> ...
> >
> > One solution would be to tighten the smackfs code so that it
> > handles the uninitialized LSM case properly.
> >
>
> IMHO no smackfs code should ever execute if smack isn't loaded.
>
> This means catching it from the very fist step where it registers
> itself in init_smk_fs instead of doing several if(we're enabled) cases
> in the code path.
>
> The solution should be a _general_ solution, _not_ a SMACK one cause
> SELinux sufferes from exactly the same problem.
>
Not to be misunderstood here, I'm used to writing SMACK in capitals.
I ,ofcourse, don't mean shouting (never will).
Regards,
--
"Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"
Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists