linux-kernel - Re: [patch 11/20] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:34:29 +0900
From:	minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [patch 11/20] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

Hi, Rik.

This is another trivial thing.

 > /*
 >  * Drain pages out of the cpu's pagevecs.
 >  * Either "cpu" is the current CPU, and preemption has already been
 >@@ -353,6 +375,8 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages,
 >
 > 		if (PageLRU(page)) {
 > 			struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
 >+			int is_lru_page;
 >+
 > 			if (pagezone != zone) {
 > 				if (zone)
 > 					spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock,

We don't use is_lru_page any more.
It cause warning at compile time.

We can remove is_lru_page local variable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/