linux-kernel - Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:56:33 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE_ALIGN alignment

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:

> It started out as a SLUB regression that was exposing poor code in the
> percpu allocator due to different SLUB kmalloc alignments. That prompted

That was due to SLUB's support for smaller allocation sizes. AFAICT has 
nothing to do with alignment.

> The SMP flag was just an RFC. I think some people (like Christoph) were
> being confused about the HWCACHE_ALIGN flag being for avoiding false
> sharing on SMP systems. It would actually be also generally useful to
> have the SMP flag (eg. see the sites I added it to in patch #3).

Hmmm. We could define a global constant for that? Determine it on bootup 
and then pass it as an alignment parameter?
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/