linux-kernel - Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:23:12 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	aurelien@...el32.net
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, matz@...e.de, Joe.Buck@...opsys.COM,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gcc@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:52:14 +0100

> H. Peter Anvin a écrit :
> > The best would be if this could be controlled by a flag, which we can
> > flip once kernel fixes has been around for long enough.
> 
> I have to agree there. Whatever the decision that gcc will take,
> distributions will reenable the old behaviour for some time for to allow
> upgrades from a previous version.

I don't think this approach is tenable.

If a distribution should ship with a "fixed" kernel and
compiler enabling the new direction flag behavior, any
binary you create on that system will be broken on any
other existing system.

I think we really are stuck with this forever, overwhelming
practice over the past 15 years has dictated to us what the
real ABI is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/