[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D9F7D02C-D312-48F3-A437-0C41ADCC4F5F@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:43:08 -0800
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@...opsys.COM>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gcc@....gnu.org" <gcc@....gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag
There are already gcc 4.3.0 packages on the FTP site.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 5, 2008, at 13:20, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@...opsys.COM> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> Linux kernel is disabling red zone and use kernel code model, yet
>>> the
>>> ABI is not going to be adjusted for that.
>>>
>>> This is resonably easy to fix on kernel side in signal handling,
>>> or by
>>> removing std usage completely
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:02:07PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
>> That is true. But it requires updating the kernel to a fixed one
>> if you
>> want to run your programs compiled by 4.3 :-/ Not something we'd
>> like to
>> demand.
>
> I changed the title just for emphasis.
>
> I think that we can't ship 4.3.0 if signal handlers on x86/x86_64
> platforms for both Linux and BSD systems will mysteriously (to the
> users)
> fail, and it doesn't matter whose fault it is.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists