linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v5 -mm] LSM: Add security= boot parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080305230604.GB6746@ubuntu>
Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 01:06:04 +0200
From:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	jmorris@...ei.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	bunk@...nel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, eparis@...isplace.org,
	adobriyan@...ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5 -mm] LSM: Add security= boot parameter

On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:56:28AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:29:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 05:04:07 +0200
> > "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Can chosen_lsm[] be __initdata?
> > 
> 
> You're the expert ;), I don't really understand the difference.
> 

After being a good citizen and reading the comments in init.h, I think
yes it should be marked so. even though we use it from init_smk_fs
since init_smk_fs is also marked as __init.

Thank you,

-- 

"Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"

Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/