linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: implement dynamic base allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:24:50 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc:	dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: implement dynamic base allocation

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:03:07 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote:

> If gpio_chip->base is negative during registration, gpiolib requests
> dynamic base allocation. This is useful for devices being registered
> at run-time (in contrast to platform devices).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

This conflicts in non-trivial ways with gpio-define-gpio_is_valid.patch. 
Could you please redo and retest against 2.6.25-rc3-mm1?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/