linux-kernel - Re: Behaviour of device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:46:53 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Adrian McMenamin <lkmladrian@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sh <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Behaviour of device_register

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:25:48PM +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> The observed behaviour for me is that it appears to be blocking the
> vblank interrupt on my box (or more accurately stopping the workqueue
> that the interrupt handler calls from running). And without the vblank
> my bus won't process dma and so therefore the attempt to register the
> device in question fails.
> 
> But I can see no reason from a glance over the code why that (vblanks
> being blocked) would be the case - have I missed something and the
> vblanks will be blocked, or should I be looking elsewhere for the root
> cause of this problem?

device_register(), on it's own, does not touch any hardware, nor prevent
anything else in the kernel from happening.

So I think you need to look elsewhere, like into the bus that is doing
the device_register() call :)

good luck,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/