[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47CE183C.7040105@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:19:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:57 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978
>>> Subject : 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression
>>> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Date : 2008-02-13 10:30
>>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/128
>>> Handled-By : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Peter's revert of the load balance patches should fix this one. Yanmin,
>> could you please confirm if the patch at
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/25/202 helps?
> I tested it against 2.6.25-rc3 on my 16-core tigerton machine. It really improves
> volano result although it doesn't recover all the result.
> Comparing with 2.6.24, without the patch, volanoMark has about 50% regression
> with 2.6.25-rc3. With the patch, volanoMark has about 15% regression.
>
Have you had a chance to git-bisect the culprit after the revert?
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists