[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47CE2B23.6010505@qumranet.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:09:55 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Notifier for Externally Mapped Memory (EMM)
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 14:35 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
>
>> RCU means that the callbacks occur in an atomic context.
>>
>
> Not really, if it requires moving the VM locks to sleepable locks under
> a .config option, I think its also fair to require PREEMPT_RCU.
>
> OTOH, if you want to unconditionally move the VM locks to sleepable
> locks you have a point.
>
Isn't that out of the question for .25?
I really wish we can get the atomic variant in now, and add on
sleepability in .26, updating users if necessary.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists