[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080306102712.GE13391@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:27:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Pawel Plociennik <paplociennik@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Pawel Plociennik wrote:
>> Hi Andrew and other *real* hackers,
>>
>> I have sent a *last* version of a patch which it has added a new kernel parameter chroot=
>> It were discusioned a *long time* on a lkml so I hope that it will has been applied.
>
> It has been discussed and *rejected* a large number of times.
>
> This is completely useless bloat.
why is it useless? Would it be more acceptable were it made dependent on
a .config option?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists