linux-kernel - Re: [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are dealocked when cpu is set to offline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080306134400.GA1915@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:14:00 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc:	Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.25-rc3] scheduler/hotplug: some processes are
	dealocked when cpu is set to offline

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:01:07PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/04, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> >
> > So at times, the callback thread is blocked on kthread_stop(k) in
> > softlockup.c, while other time, it was blocked in
> > cleanup_workqueue_threads() in workqueue.c. 
> 
> >From another message:
> >
> > However, it remains in R< state
> 
> What about cwq->thread? Was it TASK_RUNNING too?
> 
> Perhaps, for some reason the task can't get CPU after migrating from
> the now dead CPU.
> 
> I can't reproduce this problem on my one cpu P4-ht, perhaps you can
> try something like the untested/uncompiled patch below?
> 
> Oleg.
> 
> --- include/linux/sched.h	2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ include/linux/sched.h	2008-03-04 17:44:53.136738605 +0300
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>  /* hung task detection */
>  	unsigned long last_switch_timestamp;
>  	unsigned long last_switch_count;
> +	unsigned long xxx;
>  #endif
>  /* CPU-specific state of this task */
>  	struct thread_struct thread;
> --- kernel/fork.c	2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ kernel/fork.c	2008-03-04 17:45:14.773033839 +0300
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
>  	p->last_switch_count = 0;
>  	p->last_switch_timestamp = 0;
> +	p->xxx = 0;
>  #endif
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT
> --- kernel/sched.c	2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ kernel/sched.c	2008-03-04 17:48:42.308798646 +0300
> @@ -1291,6 +1291,7 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, 
>  	sched_info_queued(p);
>  	p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, wakeup);
>  	p->se.on_rq = 1;
> +	p->xxx = jiffies | 1;
>  }
> 
>  static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
> @@ -3944,6 +3945,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
>  	preempt_enable_no_resched();
>  	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
>  		goto need_resched;
> +
> +	current->xxx = 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(schedule);
> 
> --- kernel/softlockup.c	2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
> +++ kernel/softlockup.c	2008-03-04 17:49:05.584414763 +0300
> @@ -174,6 +174,27 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_
>  	touch_nmi_watchdog();
>  }
> 
> +static void check_running_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now)
> +{
> +	if (!sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
> +		return;
> +

This function gets called only when t->xxx == 0,
so the if below doesn't mean much, does it? :)

> +	if (time_before(now, t->xxx + HZ * sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
> +		return;
> +
> +	printk(KERN_ERR "INFO: task %s:%d can't get CPU for more than "
> +			"%ld seconds.\n", t->comm, t->pid,
> +			sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs);
> +
> +	if (!cpus_intersects(t->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map))
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "bad ->cpus_allowed\n");
> +	if (!cpu_online(task_cpu(t)))
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "bad ->cpu\n");
> +
> +	sched_show_task(t);
> +	touch_nmi_watchdog();
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Check whether a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE does not get woken up for
>   * a really long time (120 seconds). If that happens, print out
> @@ -183,6 +204,7 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
>  {
>  	int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
>  	unsigned long now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> +	unsigned long jiff = jiffies;
>  	struct task_struct *g, *t;
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -192,15 +214,17 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
>  	if ((tainted & TAINT_DIE) || did_panic)
>  		return;
> 
> -	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>  	do_each_thread(g, t) {
>  		if (!--max_count)
>  			goto unlock;
>  		if (t->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
>  			check_hung_task(t, now);
> +		if (!t->xxx)
> +			check_running_task(t, jiff);
>  	} while_each_thread(g, t);
>   unlock:
> -	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> 
>  /*

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/