[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803061618090.4378@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:20:57 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, clameter@....com,
joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: replace horrible hack with ksize()
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > > - if (newlen >= ct->ext->real_len) {
> > > + if (newlen >= ksize(ct->ext)) {
> >
> > This needs to look at the currently allocated size, otherwise
> > it will always realloc when adding new extensions after having
> > used up ksize(ct->ext) space.
>
> Lets say you
>
> p = kmalloc(8, ...);
>
> Then ksize(p) will return the currently allocated size which is 32 bytes
> when page size is 4 KB, and not 8 bytes. So it should be equivalent of
> what the current code does.
>
> What am I missing here?
Ok, it's not equivalent. We have two sizes: object size (8 bytes) and
buffer size (32 bytes) here. In netfilter, ->real_len is same as object
size, not buffer size as ksize() is.
But now I am officially even more confused, why does the netfilter code
decided whether to reallocate based on _object size_ and not _buffer size_
(as krealloc() does, for example)?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists