| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:02:53 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: mach_reboot_fixups()
Ingo,
was it intentional to remove the call to mach_reboot_fixups() during
the merge of reboot_{32,64}.c? If so, it seems odd that
reboot_fixups_32.c was left in the tree (and there was even stuff
added to it). But it would rather seem that those machines dealt with
in that file would not reboot properly anymore (for one of my boxes
I added an entry in that table to make it boot properly, which is why
I noticed the code not being called anymore)...
Thanks, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists