[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D027B5.5030503@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:19:49 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@...core.com>
CC: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
NightStrike <nightstrike@...il.com>,
Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
Chris Lattner <clattner@...le.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>,
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@...il.com>,
Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@...opsys.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gcc@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction
flag
Robert Dewar wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> So that is the bug in the Linux kernel. Since fixing kernel is much
>> easier
>> than providing a workaround in compilers, I think kernel should be fixed
>> and no need for icc/gcc fix.
>
> Fixing a bug in the Linux kernel is not "much easier". You are taking
> a purely engineering viewpoint, but life is not like that. There are
> lots of copies of Linux kernels around and in use. The issue is not
> fixing the kernel per se, it is propagating that change to all
> Linux kernels in use -- THAT'S another matter entirely, and is
> far far more difficult than making sure that a kernel fix is
> qualified and widely proopagated.
>
Not really, it's just a matter of time. Typical distro cycles are on
the order of 3 years.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists