[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080306155553.GA3908@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:55:53 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bugs in MMC [was: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted]
On Tue 2008-03-04 16:00:51, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, David Brownell wrote:
>
> > > What's wrong with a superfluous probe at resume time, besides the waste
> > > of a few milliseconds?
> >
> > I'm more concerned with the undesirable removal of devices at suspend
> > time ... ones with mounted filesystems etc.
>
> On that we can agree. The removal is done if the host doesn't define a
> resume method. There doesn't seem to be any point to that, given that
> the probing during resume will determine whether a card has in fact
> been removed.
Hmm, if the driver is sleeping too deeply, user might have removed the
card and put in different one, without driver noticing. That would be
_bad_.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists