linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:21:16 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	andi@...stfloor.org, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area - v3

On Thu 2008-03-06 11:26:53, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:48:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2008-03-03 15:02:46, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > > Only allocate the FPU area when the application actually uses FPU, i.e., in the
> > > first lazy FPU trap. This could save memory for non-fpu using apps.
> > 
> > How many such apps are on your system, and how much does this
> > 'optimalization' cost?
> 
> On a normal kernel boot, where there are 200 or so tasks running, only 20
> or so apps seem to be using FPU.

Aha, now I see it is useful ;-).
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/