[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0803061656180.19564-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:58:31 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make PM core handle device registrations
concurrent with suspend/hibernation
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Well, can it happen in practice? If it can, then what way can it happen?
> >
> > Yes, it can happen in practice when a new module is loaded. In some
> > ways, modules' init routines are like probe methods.
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure if it really is possible to load a module when all devices
> have been suspended. Never mind, though.
You can load the module before devices are suspended, and then its init
routine can run while the suspend is starting.
> > To be safe, I think we should make system sleep mutually exclusive with
> > module loading.
>
> Okay, is the (yet another) version of the patch below fine by you?
Yes, it's fine. Mutual exclusion with module loading can be added
later. (Ironically, it may require putting pm_sleep_rwsem back!)
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists