linux-kernel - Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080307161212.GD28439@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:12:12 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Liam Girdwood <lg@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI

On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:12:05PM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> This patch adds a description of the regulator class sysfs ABI to the
> testing directory.

Thanks for doing this, I appreciate it.

> +What:		/sys/class/regulator/.../parent
> +Date:		March 2008
> +KernelVersion:	2.6.25
> +Contact:	Liam Girdwood <lg@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> +Description:
> +		Some regulator directories will contain a link called parent.
> +		This points to the parent or supply regulator if one exists.

I don't think this is needed, why not just parent the device properly in
the device tree itself?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/