lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803080020.50474.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:20:50 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: reserve dma32 early for gart

On Saturday 08 March 2008 00:02:50 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> 



>solution will be:
>1. make memmap allocation get memory above 4G...
>2. reserve some dma32 range early before we try to set up memmap for all.
>and release that before pci_iommu_alloc, so gart or swiotlb could get some
>range under 4g limit for sure.

Funny we had (1) before vmemmap for some time, but it looks like
that regressed with vmemmap Anyways I think (1) alone should be enough, is (2) 
really needed?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ