linux-kernel - Re: headersinstall of kvm.h does not work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1204933418.2495.14.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:43:38 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: headersinstall of kvm.h does not work


On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 13:26 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> +unifdef-$(CONFIG_HAVE_KVM) += kvm.h
>  unifdef-y += llc.h
>  unifdef-y += loop.h
> ----snip------
> 
> This patch does not work. Kbuild (scripts/Makefile.headersinst) does
> not check the config file, so kvm.h is never installed.
> 
> Sam is there an easy way to allow constructs like
> "unifdef-$(CONFIG_FOO)"?

That might be justifiable for HAVE_xxx which is a constant for any given
architecture -- but I predict that soon as we add such a facility, it
would get abused for stuff which really _is_ configurable. And that
would make me sad.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/