[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080307040540.GH21185@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 05:05:40 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com,
dada1@...mosbay.com
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE_ALIGN alignment
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 07:58:06PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > Where do I argue that it reduces cacheline contention? All arguments
> > I made apply to a UP system equally.
>
> Huh? I thought you wanted to avoid cacheline alignment on UP to save
> memory?
We're talking about HWCACHE_ALIGN in this thread. SMP_ALIGN is for
reducing cacheline contention and that's where you can avoid it on UP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists