[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803071713.57795.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:13:57 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lg@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> +What: /sys/class/regulator/.../microvolts
> + ...
> +
> +What: /sys/class/regulator/.../microamps
> + ...
Versus Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which uses
millivolts and milliamperes respectively.
Why not adopt the same convention? (This applies to
many attributes, not just these two.)
Also, I'm kind of curious what you've thought about
power budgeting. Example, a power supply ("regulator")
may be able to supply a voltage within a given range,
but only up to a maximum of 200 mA worth.
The model visible through these sysfs attributes seems to
be an either/or thing ... either regulating voltage, or
current, but not addressing the corresponding constraints
on the other one.
> + NOTE: this will return the string 'constraint not defined'
How about just "undefined" for all those min/max values?
> +What: /sys/class/regulator/.../requested_microamps
> + ...
Ditto re "milli" vs "micro". Also, "requested" seems a bit opaque.
As a sum, maybe "total_mi{lli,cro}amps" would be more explanatory.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists