[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <899120.95464.qm@web36606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:07:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smackfs: Do not trust `count' in inodes write()s
--- "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Smackfs write() implementation does not put a higher bound on the
> number of bytes to copy from user-space. This may lead to a DOS
> attack if a malicious `count' field is given.
>
> Assure that given `count' is exactly the length needed for a
> /smack/load rule. In case of /smack/cipso where the length is
> relative, assure that `count' does not exceed the size needed for
> a buffer representing maximum possible number of CIPSO 2.2
> categories.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...il.com>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
One has trouble being too careful these days.
> ---
>
> smack.h | 8 --------
> smackfs.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Smack user-space utilities (smackload, smackcipso) still work
> fine after below change.
>
> [
> Who's responsible for forwarding Smack patches to Linus ?
> I've CCed Andrew and Linus just in case.
> ]
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack.h b/security/smack/smack.h
> index c444f48..4a4477f 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack.h
> +++ b/security/smack/smack.h
> @@ -27,14 +27,6 @@
> #define SMK_MAXLEN 23
> #define SMK_LABELLEN (SMK_MAXLEN+1)
>
> -/*
> - * How many kinds of access are there?
> - * Here's your answer.
> - */
> -#define SMK_ACCESSDASH '-'
> -#define SMK_ACCESSLOW "rwxa"
> -#define SMK_ACCESSKINDS (sizeof(SMK_ACCESSLOW) - 1)
> -
> struct superblock_smack {
> char *smk_root;
> char *smk_floor;
> diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> index effd3de..3fc3a07 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> @@ -81,10 +81,23 @@ static struct semaphore smack_write_sem;
> /*
> * Values for parsing cipso rules
> * SMK_DIGITLEN: Length of a digit field in a rule.
> - * SMK_CIPSOMEN: Minimum possible cipso rule length.
> + * SMK_CIPSOMIN: Minimum possible cipso rule length.
> + * SMK_CIPSOMAX: Maximum possible cipso rule length.
> */
> #define SMK_DIGITLEN 4
> -#define SMK_CIPSOMIN (SMK_MAXLEN + 2 * SMK_DIGITLEN)
> +#define SMK_CIPSOMIN (SMK_LABELLEN + 2 * SMK_DIGITLEN)
> +#define SMK_CIPSOMAX (SMK_CIPSOMIN + SMACK_CIPSO_MAXCATNUM * SMK_DIGITLEN)
> +
> +/*
> + * Values for parsing MAC rules
> + * SMK_ACCESS: Maximum possible combination of access permissions
> + * SMK_ACCESSLEN: Maximum length for a rule access field
> + * SMK_LOADLEN: Smack rule length
> + */
> +#define SMK_ACCESS "rwxa"
> +#define SMK_ACCESSLEN (sizeof(SMK_ACCESS) - 1)
> +#define SMK_LOADLEN (SMK_LABELLEN + SMK_LABELLEN + SMK_ACCESSLEN)
> +
>
> /*
> * Seq_file read operations for /smack/load
> @@ -229,14 +242,10 @@ static void smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
> * The format is exactly:
> * char subject[SMK_LABELLEN]
> * char object[SMK_LABELLEN]
> - * char access[SMK_ACCESSKINDS]
> - *
> - * Anything following is commentary and ignored.
> + * char access[SMK_ACCESSLEN]
> *
> - * writes must be SMK_LABELLEN+SMK_LABELLEN+4 bytes.
> + * writes must be SMK_LABELLEN+SMK_LABELLEN+SMK_ACCESSLEN bytes.
> */
> -#define MINIMUM_LOAD (SMK_LABELLEN + SMK_LABELLEN + SMK_ACCESSKINDS)
> -
> static ssize_t smk_write_load(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> @@ -253,7 +262,7 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_load(struct file *file, const
> char __user *buf,
> return -EPERM;
> if (*ppos != 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (count < MINIMUM_LOAD)
> + if (count != SMK_LOADLEN)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> data = kzalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -513,7 +522,7 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_cipso(struct file *file, const
> char __user *buf,
> return -EPERM;
> if (*ppos != 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (count <= SMK_CIPSOMIN)
> + if (count < SMK_CIPSOMIN || count > SMK_CIPSOMAX)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> data = kzalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -547,7 +556,7 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_cipso(struct file *file, const
> char __user *buf,
> if (ret != 1 || catlen > SMACK_CIPSO_MAXCATNUM)
> goto out;
>
> - if (count <= (SMK_CIPSOMIN + catlen * SMK_DIGITLEN))
> + if (count != (SMK_CIPSOMIN + catlen * SMK_DIGITLEN))
> goto out;
>
> memset(mapcatset, 0, sizeof(mapcatset));
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> "Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"
>
> Ahmed S. Darwish
> Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
> Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
>
>
>
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists