[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803071832500.12220@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:37:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [8/13] Enable the mask allocator for x86
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> - Disable old ZONE_DMA
> No fixed size ZONE_DMA now anymore. All existing users of __GFP_DMA rely
> on the compat call to the maskable allocator in alloc/free_pages
> - Call maskable allocator initialization functions at boot
> - Add TRAD_DMA_MASK for the compat functions
> - Remove dma_reserve call
This looks okay for the disabling part. But note that there are various
uses of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS (sparsemem, bootmem allocator) that are currently
suboptimal because they set a boundary at 16MB for allocation of
potentially large operating system structures. That boundary continues to
exist despite the removal of ZONE_DMA?
It would be better to remove ZONE_DMA32 instead and enlarge ZONE_DMA so
that it can take over the role of ZONE_DMA. Set the boundary for
MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to the boundary for ZONE_DMA32. Then the
allocations for sparse and bootmem will be allocated above 4GB which
leaves lots of the lower space available for 32 bit DMA capable devices.
Removal of ZONE_DMA32 would allow us to remove support for that zone from
the kernel in general since x86_64 is the only user of that zone.
Trouble is likely that there are existing users that have the expectation
of a 4GB boundary on ZONE_DMA32 and 16MB on ZONE_DMA (particularly old
drivers). Could we not clean that up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists