[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803072235r3ca6013cufae3ed62cd67e60f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:35:35 -0800
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [8/13] Enable the mask allocator for x86
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > - Disable old ZONE_DMA
> > No fixed size ZONE_DMA now anymore. All existing users of __GFP_DMA rely
> > on the compat call to the maskable allocator in alloc/free_pages
> > - Call maskable allocator initialization functions at boot
> > - Add TRAD_DMA_MASK for the compat functions
> > - Remove dma_reserve call
>
> This looks okay for the disabling part. But note that there are various
> uses of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS (sparsemem, bootmem allocator) that are currently
> suboptimal because they set a boundary at 16MB for allocation of
> potentially large operating system structures. That boundary continues to
> exist despite the removal of ZONE_DMA?
>
> It would be better to remove ZONE_DMA32 instead and enlarge ZONE_DMA so
> that it can take over the role of ZONE_DMA. Set the boundary for
> MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to the boundary for ZONE_DMA32. Then the
> allocations for sparse and bootmem will be allocated above 4GB which
> leaves lots of the lower space available for 32 bit DMA capable devices.
good. i like the idea...
How about system with only 4G or less?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists