[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080308085322.GA29628@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"G. Vaughan" <gvaughan@....nasa.gov>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix check after use in kernel/exit.c
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > @@ -582,9 +582,9 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk)
> > {
> > struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
> >
> > - mm_release(tsk, mm);
> > if (!mm)
> > return;
> > + mm_release(tsk, mm);
>
> thanks, applied. I'm wondering why this never seems to hit in
> practice.
actually, i unapplied it again because the patch is wrong: mm_release()
has side-effects for kernel threads such as the deactivate_mm() [which
is important even if the user-mm is NULL]. If the NULL mm dereference
can really trigger then it should be avoided within mm_release().
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists