[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080308132614.GA9412@dastardly.plus.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:26:14 +0000
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@...da.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, sct@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] jbd2: eliminate duplicated code in revocation table
init/destroy functions
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:05:26PM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > > + if (!journal->j_revoke_table[0])
> > > + goto failed_alloc1;
> > > + if (jbd2_journal_init_revoke_table(journal->j_revoke_table[0], hash_size))
> >
> > (style) wrap at 80 columns.
> >
>
> checkpatch.pl catched this...fyi.
It did :)
After following recent LKML threads on this I figured it would probably
be more readable to leave it than fix it. I should have mentioned that,
sorry. Anyway, it is no longer an issue after addressing Andreas'
comments.
> Thanks for reviewing this Andreas.
My thanks, too. I really appreciate the quick and thorough review.
> The patch is already in ext4 candidate patch queue. FYI.
If I can do anything to simplify updating it with revised versions then
let me know.
> Mingming
Cheers,
Duane.
--
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists