linux-kernel - Re: SWNCQ should be enabled by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:08:50 +0100
From:	Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@...aweb.hu>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, prakash@...noor.de, pchen@...dia.com,
	kluo@...dia.com
Subject: Re: SWNCQ should be enabled by default

Robert Hancock írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>> Ping. Now with patch.
>>
>> Zoltan Boszormenyi írta:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the patch is already upstream, thanks for that.
>>> I am using it without any problems. Currently I am
>>> using kernel-2.6.24.3-12.fc8 from the updates-testing
>>> repository of Fedora 8. I had to add
>>>
>>> options scsi_hostadapter1 swncq=1
>>> options sata_nv swncq=1
>>>
>>> before upgrading to get it enabled.
>>> Can we enable it by default for 2.6.25?
>>> It's completely independent from ADMA and its problems.
>>> E.g. my machine has 8GB memory now, no problems at all.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Zoltán Böszörményi
>>
>
> I'll ACK this, at least for -mm..

Thanks. On the other hand, the meat of the SWNCQ patch
had its exposure in -mm, there were no problem reports...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/