[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080309114640.85c9c3eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:46:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Subject: Re: quicklists confuse meminfo
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:34:32 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> the right solution is to get rid of quicklists altogether
Yes, I think so.
- They are pretty marginal from a performance POV (iirc)
- They've been a relatively rich source of bugs
- As I said when we merged them (under protest): Private object caches
like this are just a bad idea - caches should be *shared*, because some
other code path which wants a zeroed page wants a cache-warm one, not a
cache-cold one from the allocator (iirc there was doubt over how
cache-warm these pages are, however).
Making __GFP_ZERO smarter/more efficient would be a preferable way of
addressing any performance problems we have in there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists