[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080309120133.2d1363e4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:01:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...urebad.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add time_now_after and other macros which compare
with jiffies
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:08:08 +0000 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > Yes, This has a purpose as well. You will find most of the usage of these
> > macros are just compare some value with jiffies after doing some grep.
>
> That is no reason to add more macros that hide how they do it, or make
> jiffies itself invisible to the grep search or variable usage finding
> tools (and for tickless that very thing is important)
We could call them time_is_after_jiffies(), time_is_before_jiffies(), etc.
Those names are actually better than time_after_now(), etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists