[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080309201152.GB28454@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:11:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, heukelum@...tmail.fm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Change x86 to use generic find_next_bit
* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com> wrote:
> --- a/lib/find_next_bit.c
> +++ b/lib/find_next_bit.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>
> #define BITOP_WORD(nr) ((nr) / BITS_PER_LONG)
> +#undef find_next_bit
> +#undef find_next_zero_bit
this bit looks weird - did you need it for testing?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists