linux-kernel - Re: assfail during unmount xfs 2.6.24.3 [from 2.6.24.y git]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:18:58 +1100
From:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To:	Chris Knadle <Chris.Knadle@...edump.us>
Cc:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: assfail during unmount xfs 2.6.24.3 [from 2.6.24.y git]

On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:55:08PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:29:07PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > During the final unmount before reboot there was an assertion failure
> > > from XFS 
> ...
> > > When replying please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed to the list.
> ...
> > > Assertion failed: atomic_read(&mp->m_active_trans) == 0, file:
> > > fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c, line: 708
> 
>    Thank you for taking the time to look and reply to this.
> 
> > Known problem. Race in the VFS w.r.t. read-only remounts:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120106649923499&w=2
> 
>    At the bottom of the above message there's a patch which is not currently 
> merged in either the linux-2.6.24.y.git or linux-2.6.git trees.  That's 
> perhaps as it should be, but I would like to know if it's worth trying 
> merging the patch locally as an attempted workaround until such time as 
> 2.6.25 is released and stable.

Sure, the patch is harmless - I've had it running in my local tree for
quite some time now.

> 
> > The fix for the problem lies outside XFS:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120109304227035&w=2
> 
>    If I understand the above correctly, it sounds like the per-vfsmount is 
> going to be a new feature committed to 2.6.25, but probably not backported to 
> prior kernel trees.

Right.

> If this feature was was added at 2.6.23.9 then if I 
> understand corectly it's only an issue between that version and 2.6.25; is 
> that correct?

Only if the per-vfsmount writer counts got merged in 2.6.25-rcX. I'm not sure
that they did. Christoph?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/