linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47D4BA48.4080107@tuxrocks.com>
Date:	Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:34:16 -0500
From:	Frank Sorenson <frank@...rocks.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Due to the lack of time for reviewing all of the email threads related to the
> regressions marked as "unresolved" below, I might have missed some patches
> fixing them.  If you are involved in debugging/fixing any of them, please let
> me know if I should update the list.  Thanks!]
> 
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24 reported since
> 2.6.25-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
> of.  If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
> 
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please let me know
> either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
> entries below are invalid.


> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10187
> Subject		: 2.6.25-rc4 OOMs itself dead on bootup
> Submitter	: Frank Sorenson <frank@...rocks.com>
> Date		: 2008-03-06 17:26
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=120482709209046&amp;w=2
> Handled-By	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/8/15

Not a regression, and the patch is not required.  The OOM was caused by
something specific to my system, and it's been resolved.

Frank
- --
Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
Linux Systems Engineer, DSS Engineering, UBS AG
frank@...rocks.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH1LpFaI0dwg4A47wRAojeAKCdZVriUHycsWCTkvgxnHS8jSopAwCfX9qP
gHgqRtuLjFgzE4liNFZtf2o=
=PTNr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/