[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080310120902.5f25b9f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:09:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: pj@....com, clameter@....com, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, ak@...e.de,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 1/2] mempolicy: disallow static or relative flags
for local preferred mode
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:24:15 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES and MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES don't mean anything for
> MPOL_PREFERRED policies that were created with an empty nodemask (for
> purely local allocations). They'll never be invalidated because the
> allowed mems of a task changes or need to be rebound relative to a
> cpuset's placement.
>
> Also fixes a bug identified by Lee Schermerhorn that disallowed empty
> nodemasks to be passed to MPOL_PREFERRED to specify local allocations.
I get a significant-looking reject from this. Can you please redo and
resend?
I put my current rollup (against -rc5) at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dr.gz and the broken-out tree is, as always
at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
It would be better for you to get set up for using mmotm - it is my usual
way of publishing the -mm queue between releases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists