[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803101853090.15511@blonde.site>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:14:14 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: P6 NOPs again: MPSC?
I've now noticed that the machine I call MPENTIUM4 for 32-bit kernels
is called MPSC for 64-bit kernels, and in that case it still doesn't
get the P6 NOPs which I'm guessing it ought to (yeah, I'm so excited
about the speedup I can expect from P6 NOPs, can we perhaps have a
little silvery "Using Genuine P6 NOPs" sticker to put on the box? ;)
I'm suspecting that the patch below is actually wrong, and that it's
really the "(X86_64 || !X86_GENERIC) &&" which should be changed;
but very unsure of my ground and what's right for CPU_GENERIC -
the 32/64 heritage of x86/Kconfig.cpu rather confuses me.
Over to you to do the right thing, I'm hoping, please, Peter!
Thanks,
Hugh
--- 2.6.25-rc5/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu 2008-03-05 11:27:23.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu 2008-03-10 18:48:10.000000000 +0000
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ config X86_OOSTORE
#
config X86_P6_NOP
def_bool y
- depends on (X86_64 || !X86_GENERIC) && (M686 || MPENTIUMII || MPENTIUMIII || MPENTIUMM || MCORE2 || MPENTIUM4)
+ depends on (X86_64 || !X86_GENERIC) && (M686 || MPENTIUMII || MPENTIUMIII || MPENTIUMM || MCORE2 || MPENTIUM4 || MPSC)
config X86_TSC
def_bool y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists