[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080310152556.76868270.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:25:56 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: ego@...ibm.com
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
rjw@...k.pl, dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
oleg@...n.ru, yi.y.yang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-hotplug: Register update_sched_domains() notifier
with higher prio
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:43:55 +0530 Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com> wrote:
> cpu-hotplug: Register update_sched_domains() notifier with higher prio
> From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
>
> The current -rt wake_up logic uses the rq->rd->online_map which is
> updated on cpu-hotplug events by update_sched_domains(). Currently
> update_sched_domains() is registered with a priority 0. It is
> preferable that update_sched_domains() be the first notifier called on
> a CPU_DEAD or CPU_ONLINE events inorder to ensure that the
> rq->rd->online_map is in sync with the cpu_online_map.
>
> This way on a CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
> we would destroy the sched_domains and reattach all the rq's to the
> def_root_domain. This will be followed by a CPU_DOWN_PREPARE in
> migration_call() which will clear the bit of the cpu going offline
> from the corresponding rq.
> This will ensure that no task will be woken up on the cpu which is
> going to be offlined between CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_DEAD.
>
> Ditto for the CPU_ONLINE path.
>
> Tested on a 4-way Intel Xeon Box with cpu-hotplug tests running in parallel
> with kernbench.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 69ecb1a..374c46f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -7079,8 +7079,16 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
> if (cpus_empty(non_isolated_cpus))
> cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), non_isolated_cpus);
> put_online_cpus();
> - /* XXX: Theoretical race here - CPU may be hotplugged now */
> - hotcpu_notifier(update_sched_domains, 0);
> + /*
> + * XXX: Theoretical race here - CPU may be hotplugged now
> + *
> + * We register the notifier with priority 11, which means that
> + * update_sched_domains() will be called just before migration_call().
> + *
> + * This is necessary to ensure that the rt wake up logic works fine
> + * and the rq->rd->online_map remains in sync with the cpu_online_map.
> + */
> + hotcpu_notifier(update_sched_domains, 11);
>
> /* Move init over to a non-isolated CPU */
> if (set_cpus_allowed(current, non_isolated_cpus) < 0)
This fixes my poweroff-doesn't-work post-2.6.24 regression.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists