| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:17:24 +0100
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] x86: Optimize find_next_(zero_)bit for small constant-size bitmaps
x86: Optimize find_next_(zero_)bit for small constant-size bitmaps
NOTE: This is not well tested. I'm also quite unsure if this makes the
pre-processor situation any better.
On an i386 defconfig (the x86#testing one), the size of vmlinux hardly
changes with this applied. I have observed only four places where this
optimization avoids a call into find_next_bit:
In the functions return_unused_surplus_pages, alloc_fresh_huge_page,
and adjust_pool_surplus, this patch avoids a call for a 1-bit bitmap.
In __next_cpu a call is avoided for a 32-bit bitmap. That's it.
On x86_64 I observed the following (I did not look closely yet, though).
Current #testing defconfig:
146 x bsf, 27 x find_next_*bit
text data bss dec hex filename
5392637 846592 724424 6963653 6a41c5 vmlinux
After removing the x86_64 specific optimization for find_next_*bit:
94 x bsf, 79 x find_next_*bit
text data bss dec hex filename
5392358 846592 724424 6963374 6a40ae vmlinux
After this patch (making the optimization generic):
146 x bsf, 27 x find_next_*bit
text data bss dec hex filename
5392396 846592 724424 6963412 6a40d4 vmlinux
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
---
> ok - but this needs to be solved in a cleaner way. That build-time
> optimization needs to be pushed into generic code so that 32-bit x86 and
> other architectures can make use of it as well. The lib/find_next_bit.c
> functions should be named __find_next_bit() or so.
>
> Ingo
I think this is what you had in mind? It seems to work.
Alternative implementation ideas? Comments? In particular: does
this break non-x86?
Greetings,
Alexander
include/asm-x86/bitops.h | 4 +-
include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h | 10 -------
include/linux/bitops.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/find_next_bit.c | 10 +++----
4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
index 7fbf93a..cbbe329 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
@@ -312,9 +312,9 @@ static int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr);
#undef ADDR
-unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+unsigned long __find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
-unsigned long find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+unsigned long __find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h
index 40bf0f8..87e1a17 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h
@@ -20,21 +20,11 @@ static inline long __scanbit(unsigned long val, unsigned long max)
(__scanbit(*(unsigned long *)addr,(size))) : \
find_first_bit(addr,size)))
-#define find_next_bit(addr,size,off) \
-((__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size) <= BITS_PER_LONG ? \
- ((off) + (__scanbit((*(unsigned long *)addr) >> (off),(size)-(off)))) : \
- find_next_bit(addr,size,off)))
-
#define find_first_zero_bit(addr,size) \
((__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size) <= BITS_PER_LONG ? \
(__scanbit(~*(unsigned long *)addr,(size))) : \
find_first_zero_bit(addr,size)))
-#define find_next_zero_bit(addr,size,off) \
-((__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size) <= BITS_PER_LONG ? \
- ((off)+(__scanbit(~(((*(unsigned long *)addr)) >> (off)),(size)-(off)))) : \
- find_next_zero_bit(addr,size,off)))
-
static inline void set_bit_string(unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long i,
int len)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
index 69c1edb..ba78ca1 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
@@ -72,4 +72,64 @@ static inline unsigned fls_long(unsigned long l)
return fls64(l);
}
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT
+unsigned long __find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+ unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long
+find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
+ unsigned long offset)
+{
+ unsigned long value;
+
+ /* Here we would like to use a version of ffs that */
+ /* returns BITS_PER_LONG if its argument is zero. */
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size == BITS_PER_LONG)) {
+ value = (*addr) & ((~0ul) << offset);
+ return (value == 0) ? BITS_PER_LONG : __ffs(value);
+ }
+
+ /* Less than BITS_PER_LONG: put in sentinel, then __ffs */
+ /* Here we would like to have a __set_bit/__ffs combo */
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size < BITS_PER_LONG)) {
+ value = (*addr) & ((~0ul) << offset);
+ value |= (1ul << size);
+ return __ffs(value);
+ }
+
+ /* size not constant or too big */
+ return __find_next_bit(addr, size, offset);
+}
+
+unsigned long __find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+ unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long
+find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
+ unsigned long offset)
+{
+ unsigned long value;
+
+ /* Here we would like to use a version of ffs that */
+ /* returns BITS_PER_LONG if its argument is zero. */
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size == BITS_PER_LONG)) {
+ value = (~(*addr)) & ((~0ul) << offset);
+ return (value == 0) ? BITS_PER_LONG : __ffs(value);
+ }
+
+ /* Less than BITS_PER_LONG: put in sentinel, then __ffs */
+ /* Here we would like to have a __set_bit/__ffs combo. */
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && (size < BITS_PER_LONG)) {
+ value = (~(*addr)) & ((~0ul) << offset);
+ value |= (1ul << size);
+ return __ffs(value);
+ }
+
+ /* size not constant or too big */
+ return __find_next_zero_bit(addr, size, offset);
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT */
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif
diff --git a/lib/find_next_bit.c b/lib/find_next_bit.c
index 5820e07..5249f4a 100644
--- a/lib/find_next_bit.c
+++ b/lib/find_next_bit.c
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
#define BITOP_WORD(nr) ((nr) / BITS_PER_LONG)
-#undef find_next_bit
-#undef find_next_zero_bit
/**
* find_next_bit - find the next set bit in a memory region
@@ -24,8 +22,8 @@
* @offset: The bitnumber to start searching at
* @size: The maximum size to search
*/
-unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
- unsigned long offset)
+unsigned long __find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+ unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
{
const unsigned long *p = addr + BITOP_WORD(offset);
unsigned long result = offset & ~(BITS_PER_LONG-1);
@@ -69,8 +67,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_bit);
* This implementation of find_{first,next}_zero_bit was stolen from
* Linus' asm-alpha/bitops.h.
*/
-unsigned long find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
- unsigned long offset)
+unsigned long __find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+ unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
{
const unsigned long *p = addr + BITOP_WORD(offset);
unsigned long result = offset & ~(BITS_PER_LONG-1);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists