[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080310085539.6815693C900@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:55:39 +0100
From: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@...tmail.fm>
To: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@...tmail.fm>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4
aeriksson@...tmail.fm said:
> torvalds@...ux-foundation.org said:
>> I think we do want the bisect run here.
>> My worry is that this is likely very timing-sensitive, so when it starts
>> failing it might not be because of the commit that actually introduces the
>> bug, but because some other timing changed, but with some luck that won't
>> be the case.
> I'm on it. Slow machine. Household's router, 4000 versions to go...
The bisect came up with this:
18a056feccabdfa9764016a615121b194828bc72 is first bad commit
commit 18a056feccabdfa9764016a615121b194828bc72
Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Date: Sat Jan 26 20:13:12 2008 +0100
ide: don't enable local IRQs for PIO-in in driver_cmd_intr() (take 2)
Don't enable local IRQs for PIO-in protocol in driver_cmd_intr().
While at it:
* Remove redundant rq->cmd_type check.
* Read status register after enabling local IRQs for no-data protocol.
v2:
* Re-add DRQ=1 check lost in v1 (noticed by Sergei).
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
:040000 040000 5fb514a261b13494c5e9c035f9e7598276ce8839 0fda2eb7d96335061741d7f54ed3e05ca34ac5b8 M drivers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists