linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080310115237.GA29197@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:37 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@....de>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, devzero@....de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rick@...rein.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory

On Mon 2008-03-10 12:24:06, Jan-Simon Möller wrote:
> Am Montag 10 März 2008 11:14:48 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > Feel free to improve memmap documentation.
> 
> 
> BUT ...
> to do that, I would need to know already a bit of memmap ?!
> 
> This is a Chicken-egg-problem ! 
> 
> And I won't "waste" my time if i've a solution at hand already ?!

...so you waste everyone elses...?

> Lets do it like this: Show me what i need to know about the usage of memmap 
> and i'll write some doc. 
> 
> Just shouting "write your own doc" is pointless, as I don't know this part of 
> the kernel myself (yet).

Read the thread you are replying to. It was already there.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/