[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D63C29.90304@tiscali.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:00:41 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
To: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
CC: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] MMC: DATA_CARRY is not boolean in tifm_sd_transfer_data()
(was: MMC: logical-bitwise and confusion in tifm_sd_transfer_data()?)
Alex Dubov wrote:
> --- Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:31:08 +0100
>> Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> from drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c:183:
>>>
>>> if ((r_data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE)
>>> && DATA_CARRY)
>>>
>>> shouldn't this be bit-wise &?
>> First off, I'm not the maintainer of that driver, Alex Dubov is.
>>
>> Second, the code seems broken, but not in the way you suggest. It should probably have been:
>>
>> if ((r_data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE)
>> && (host->cmd_flags & DATA_CARRY))
>>
>
> Yes, this is the intended meaning. Can you fix it yourself or should I send a separate patch?
Thanks,
---
DATA_CARRY is not boolean
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
---
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c
index 20d5c7b..1c14a18 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static void tifm_sd_transfer_data(struct tifm_sd *host)
host->sg_pos++;
if (host->sg_pos == host->sg_len) {
if ((r_data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE)
- && DATA_CARRY)
+ && (host->cmd_flags & DATA_CARRY))
writel(host->bounce_buf_data[0],
host->dev->addr
+ SOCK_MMCSD_DATA);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists