[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803110956.37619.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:56:37 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, warthog19@...lescrag.net,
kristen.c.accardi@...el.com, rick.jones2@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI PCI slot detection driver
On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:28 am Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:10:40PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > 1) I checked ACPI spec again and again, but I could not find any
> > reason to add Fujitsu servers to quirks list. So I'd like you to
> > add HP servers to the quirks list. I'll send the following patches
> > followed by this e-mail.
>
> Alex pointed out that IBM interprets the spec the same way that HP does.
> Are there any other machines that follow the spec the same way that
> Fujitsu does?
So Kenji is arguing that _STA should be called before _SUN (iow that the _SUN
value is bogus unless _STA indicates that the slot is powered)? That seems
harder for the user; often times you want to find a slot even if it's powered
down & empty (say to add a new card)... It looks like the current code won't
provide a slot name on Fujitsu machines in this case, or am I missing
something?
Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists