linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200803111256.51267.phillips@phunq.net>
Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:56:50 -0800
From:	Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
To:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc:	Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@...e.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@...com.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet

On Tuesday 11 March 2008 10:26, Chris Friesen wrote:
> I have experienced many 2.6 crashes due to software flaws.  Hung 
> processes leading to watchdog timeouts, bad kernel pointers, kernel 
> deadlock, etc.
> 
> When designing for reliable embedded systems it's not enough to handwave 
> away the possibility of software flaws.

Indeed.  You fix them.  Which 2.6 kernel version failed for you, what
made it fail, and does the latest version still fail?

If Linux is not reliable then we are doomed and I do not care about
whether my ramback fails because I will just slit my wrists anyway.
How about you?

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/