lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803121013.20810.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:13:20 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement slub fastpath with sequence number

On Wednesday 12 March 2008 01:45, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> 
wrote:
> >  Wow. I applaud the effort to micro optimise things ;)
> >
> >  But I hope this doesn't get merged until macro-regressions in SLUB
> >  are verified to be fixed. It's pretty clear that SLUB's problem is
> >  not fastpath performance, so I think this would be premature
> >  optimisation.
>
> What regressions are you referring to? The SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN
> regression patch you sent is being merged. What else?

The oracle/tpcc one I don't know if it has been fixed?


> And FWIW, I don't like the patch because it makes the code very hairy.
> But I don't see why we shouldn't merge SLUB fast-path optimizations if
> they're clean and you have the numbers to show it's a gain even if
> there are other remaining regressions.

I'm talking about this patch specifically though. It makes it much
harder to work with.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ