[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080311021928.B725E26F991@magilla.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation"
> For various reasons we can't currently do the same for sig_kernel_coredump()
> signals. But, when rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] == 0, we don't actually need coredumping?
> So, we could do something like
>
>
> - if (!sig_kernel_coredump(sig)) {
> + if (!sig_kernel_coredump(sig) || !signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CORE]) {
I don't like this. I think it's better to leave logic like RLIMIT_CORE
checks to the core dump code itself.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists