linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-rc2 Regression Thinkpad acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:55:21 +0100
From:	Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 Regression Thinkpad acpi

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:35:29AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> You shouldn't need to do anything other than teach userspace to respond to
> them, as they generate the proper KEY_* events.  If you are giving the AML
> _OSI(Linux), at least...
> 
> But maybe looking at the keyboard output in console mode, to make triple
> sure the events ARE being sent over the KDC as they should, would be in
> order?

so, do I understand correctly that volume keys have been controlled by ACPI
and seemed to work independently on SW and now (exactly since when?) are
passed complety to the user space as key codes?

-- 
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/