[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080312011954.GN12370@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:19:54 -0700
From: akepner@....com
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Nelson <mdnelson@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] dma: document dma_{un}map_{single|sg}_attrs() interface
I have a new proposal for the documentation portion of this
patchset. The code changes essentially amount to
s/DMA_ATTR_SYNC_ON_WRITE/DMA_ATTR_BARRIER/ so thought I'd send
just the doc change for comments now.
The description of the DMA_ATTR_BARRIER is now very short and
generic - no particular architecture is even mentioned. I can add
a sentence or two near the architecture-specific changes in
arch/ia64/sn/pci/pci_dma.c about why the implementation works
on ia64/sn, etc.
diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt b/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt
index e69de29..a4106ec 100644
--- a/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+ DMA attributes
+ ==============
+
+This document describes the semantics of the DMA attributes that are
+defined in linux/dma-attrs.h.
+
+DMA_ATTR_BARRIER
+----------------
+
+DMA_ATTR_BARRIER is a barrier attribute for DMA. DMA to a memory
+region with the DMA_ATTR_BARRIER attribute forces all pending DMA
+writes to complete, and thus provides a mechanism to strictly order
+DMA from a device across all intervening busses and bridges. This
+barrier is not specific to a particular type of interconnect, it
+applies to the system as a whole, and so its implementation must
+account for the idiosyncracies of the system all the way from the
+DMA device to memory.
+
+As an example of a situation where DMA_ATTR_BARRIER would be useful,
+suppose that a device does a DMA write to indicate that data is ready
+and available in memory. The DMA of the "completion indication" could
+race with data DMA. Mapping the memory used for completion indications
+with DMA_ATTR_BARRIER would prevent the race.
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists